Earth is richly supplied with different types of living organisms which co-exist in their environments, forming complex, interrelated communities. Living organisms depend on one another for nutrients, shelter, and other benefits. The extinction of one species can set off a chain reaction that affects many other species, particularly if the loss occurs near the bottom of the food chain. For example, the extinction of a particular insect or plant might seem inconsequential. However, there may be fish or small animals that depend on that resource for foodstuffs. The loss can threaten the survival of these creatures and larger predators that prey upon them. Extinction can have a ripple effect that spreads throughout nature.

   In addition to its biological consequences, extinction poses a moral dilemma for humans, the only species capable of saving the others. The presence of humans on the planet has affected all other life forms, particularly plants and animals. Human lifestyles have proven to be incompatible with the survival of some other species. Purposeful efforts have been made to eliminate animals that prey on people, livestock, crops, or pose any threat to human livelihoods. Some wild animals have been decimated by human desire for meat, hides, fur, or other body parts with commercial value. Likewise, demand for land, water, and other natural resources has left many wild plants and animals with little to no suitable habitat. Humans have also affected nature by introducing non-native species to local areas and producing pollutants having a negative impact on the environment. The combination of these human-related effects and natural obstacles such as disease or low birthrates has proven to be too much for some species to overcome. They have no chance of survival without human help.

   As a result, societies have difficult choices to make about the amount of effort and money they are willing to spend to save imperiled species. Will people accept limits on their property rights, recreational activities, and means of livelihood to save a plant or an animal? Should saving such popular species as whales and dolphins take priority over saving obscure, annoying, or fearful species? Is it the responsibility of humans to save every kind of life form from disappearing, or is extinction an inevitable part of nature, in which the strong survive and the weak perish? These are some difficult questions that people face as they ponder the fate of other species living on this planet.

Which of the following can result from the loss of one species in a food chain?

Câu hỏi liên quan

• It can be inferred from the passage that ___________.

• The passage supports which of the following conclusions?

• What happened when the writer's father came?

ZUNIA12

• What possible use for beta blockers was NOT discussed in this passage?

• The word “it” refers to __________.

• What does "this" in the third paragraph refer to .............

• Nowadays there are ____________.

• Green algae is generally found________.

• According to the writer, many people from Jamaica at that time ________.

• When the writer first went to London, he was disappointed because ________.

• The word “reluctant” in line 13 can best be replaced by ________.

• When did the the Pilgrims make a difficult trip to across the ocean from England?

• According to the passage, one exceedingly clever student has ___________

• How did the publication of Moby Dick affect Melville’s popularity?

• Which of the following statements about primary cooperation is supported by information in the passage?

• All of the following statements are true EXCEPT ............

• In paragraph 2, cities like London, Copenhagen, and Amsterdam are mentioned ............

• According to the reading passage, how did Joseph Pulitzer appeal to the average reader?

• The phrase “more achievement oriented” in the paragraph 6 is closest in meaning to ______.

• What might be the most suitable title for this reading passage?